- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 11:33:01 +0100
- To: xmlschema-dev@w3.org
Hi,
Daniel Acton wrote:
>
> The two instances will have the same elements, but with a different root
> element. Do I have to write two seperate schemas for this? The examples
> I've been looking at have this kind of definition of the root element:
You have many ways to do it, the only common point being that you'll
have to use a xsd:choice at some point...
One of them is to define a complexType that will be used to define both
dogs and cats:
<xsd:complexType name="animal">
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="height" .../>
<xsd:element name="weight" .../>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
and to use a xsd:choice in the definition of your root element:
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element type="someComplexType" name="xmlRootElement"/>
<xsd:complexType name="someComplexType">
<xsd:choice minOccurs="..." maxOccurs="...">
<xsd:element name="Dog" type="animal" .../>
<xsd:element name="Cat" type="animal" .../>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:complexType>
<!-- Rest of schema definition here -->
</xsd:schema>
You'll find another example of xsd:choice in the tutorial that we've
recently published on XML.com
(http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2000/11/29/schemas/part1.html?page=4#groups).
Hope this helps.
Eric
--
See you at XML 2000
http://gca.org/attend/2000_conferences/XML_2000/building.htm#vlist
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com
http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 1 December 2000 05:30:12 UTC