Christoph Lupprich wrote: > I noticed that references to RFC documents in the SOAP 1.1 specification > (http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/) are linking to normos.org > which isn't available anymore. I don't know what the W3C rules are about maintaining or republishing W3C Notes. Normally, documents like Notes are archival, I think, and I don't believe they are normally actively maintained. That said, the SOAP 1.1 note is clearly one that is referenced actively by many people and for more than historical reasons. Speaking only as an individual co-author of the Note, it makes sense to me that it be republished with the links revised to point to appropriate copies of the RFCs. In any case, thank you for the comment. I am no longer a member of the XML Protocols Working Group, but I expect the current members will give serious consideration to your concerns. Noah -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- "Christoph Lupprich" <christoph@lupprich.info> Sent by: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org 01/22/2008 06:10 AM To: xmlp-comments@w3.org cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: [xmlp-comments] <none> Hi there, I noticed that references to RFC documents in the SOAP 1.1 specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/) are linking to normos.org which isn't available anymore. Kind regards, Christoph --- Christoph Lupprich christoph@lupprich.info http://stopbeingcarbon.comReceived on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 13:39:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 January 2008 13:39:09 GMT