W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > March 2007

Re: Issues regarding PER of SOAP 1.2

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 16:24:15 -0400 (EDT)
To: kirk.wilson@ca.com
Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703221618370.27489@ubzre.j3.bet>

Dear Kirk,

The Working Group decided to close this issue (rec44) with the following 

(in part 0)
> One minor typo in section 1: "[ResRep]specifes" should be "[ResRep]
> (specifies"

Fixed in the edcopy [1]

(in part 2)

A minor organizational point.  The specification seems to be of two
minds regarding whether MEPs are Features or something sui generis.  Part
I asserts that MEPs are Features; however, sections 7.3 and 7.4 (and
following sections) in Part II treats MEPs as something other than
Features.  The HTTP binding supports the following Features: 2 MEPs as
specified, web-method and action.  At a minimum, 7.4 should say that the
binding MUST support the following "additional" features.

The working group decided to adopt the proposed resolution and the text in 
7.4 has been amended with "additional", see the edcopy in [2]

If this resolution is not satisfying, please let the WG know.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part0.html
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.html

Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

Received on Thursday, 22 March 2007 20:24:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:01 UTC