W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Issue rec31 closed

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 19:04:02 -0400
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFEAF6452E.DC902891-ON8525700C.007E753C-8525700C.007EB6E9@lotus.com>

Mark Baker wrote:

> I'm a bit surprised this action was taken before Noah and
> I had finished discussing the issue,

I hope it's clear that my correspondence never represented official 
contact from the workgroup, but was just intended as my own contributions 
to the discussion.  I think that I as well as you have been responsible 
for the slow pace of the discussion, and I'm sorry for that.  Nonetheless, 
I don't think the WG ever intended to formal premise their resolution 
based on the progress of that interaction (though of course, if we'd 
reached any easy conclusions, it might have helped.)  I'm sorry for any 
confusion caused on that score.

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Sent by: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org
05/25/2005 03:43 AM

 
        To:     Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
        cc:     xmlp-comments@w3.org, (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        Re: Issue rec31 closed



Hi Martin.  I'm a bit surprised this action was taken before Noah and
I had finished discussing the issue, but I understand that the
discussion hasn't progressed very quickly due to my travel itinerary
this month.

I'll continue the discussion when I get some time, and we'll see what
comes of that.

Cheers,

Mark.

On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 03:43:25AM -0700, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> Mark,
> 
> You sent e-mail[1] to the XMLP comments list which resulted in Rec Issue
> 31[2] being entered into the issues list. The XMLP WG has considered
> your comments and concluded that it is not appropriate to address this
> comment in a Proposed Edited Recommendation or Second Edition of SOAP
> 1.2. It is also not clear that the XMLP WG is the most appropriate place
> to deal with this issue, which, as you allude to, is not unique to SOAP.
> 
> 
> Thus the XMLP WG is not going to take any action regarding this issue.
> 
> If this resolution is NOT acceptable to you, please let the Working
> Group know.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Martin Gudgin
> For the XMLP WG 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2005Apr/0000.html
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-rec-issues.html#x31

-- 
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.          http://www.markbaker.ca
Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies   http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 23:04:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT