W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > October 2004

RE: Closing Issue 502 ( was RE: Issue 502 is closed )

From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:42:47 -0700
Message-ID: <DD35CC66F54D8248B6E04232892B633803A29003@RED-MSG-43.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Martin Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "I18n WSTF" <public-i18n-ws@w3.org>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>

I also note that the implementation page[2] will be updated to include
traces for messages that have resource attributes that contain non-ascii
characters.

Regards

Martin 

[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/4/08/implementation.html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Gudgin 
> Sent: 15 October 2004 12:40
> To: 'Martin Duerst'; I18n WSTF; xmlp-comments@w3.org
> Cc: Yves Lafon
> Subject: Closing Issue 502 ( was RE: Issue 502 is closed )
> 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xmlp-comments-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:xmlp-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Duerst
> > Sent: 07 October 2004 23:58
> > To: Yves Lafon; I18n WSTF
> > Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: Issue 502 is closed
> > 
> > 
> > Hello Yves, others,
> > 
> > This is the official response of the I18N WG (WS Task Force) to
> > your response on your issue number 502.
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x502
> > 
> > At 20:22 04/09/24 +0200, Yves Lafon wrote:
> > >On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, A. Vine wrote:
> > >
> > >[issue 502 [1] covers the points 5 and 6 of your email [2]. ]
> > >
> > >The XMLP WG decided to close issue 502 with the following 
> resolution:
> > >
> > >point 5:
> > >The following text was added to section 4.2.2:
> > ><<<
> > >The value of the resource attribute information SHOULD be a 
> > URI Reference 
> > >as defined in RFC 2396 including ammendments to that 
> > definition found in 
> > >RFC 2732.
> > 
> > This would rule out IRIs. But we explicitly asked for allowing IRIs.
> > It is unclear to us why this was rejected, and we would 
> have to object
> > to such a decision.
> 
> Dear Martin and I18N,
> 
> Regarding issue 502[1], the XMLP Working Group has amended 
> section 4.2.2 if the Resource Representation SOAP Header 
> Block specification to read:
> 
> "The type of the resource attribute information item is 
> xs:anyURI. The value of the resource attribute information 
> item is a URI that identifies the Web resource whose 
> representation is carried in the rep:Representation element 
> information item parent of the resource attribute information 
> item. NOTE: the use of the xs:anyURI type anticipates the 
> possibility that in future schemes will be developed that use 
> IRI rather than URI naming for resources."
> 
> We trust this addresses your concern about allowing IRIs in 
> the resource attribute.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Martin Gudgin
> For the XMLP WG
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-cr-issues.html#x502
> 
Received on Friday, 15 October 2004 11:43:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT