W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > October 2004

comments about the examples in http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-xop10-20040826/

From: Frank Yung-Fong Tang <franktang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 18:30:40 +0000
Message-ID: <2e4dfd69041008113027429176@mail.gmail.com>
To: xmlp-comments@w3.org

The two examples in session "1.2 Example" show the one that Prior to
the XOP processing "look" shorter than the one apply XOP processing.
It is hard for reader to understand why using the XOP mean "more
efficiently serializing XML Infosets" if you show the one apply XOP is
LONGER in the example. (I understand what you mean there, but at frist
glance, the example show reader, the one prior tot he XOP is "more
efficiently serializing".
Basically, it is comparing Apple to Orange because the first one in
the example does not include HTTP header at all. To make it a fair
compasion could be done by replacing (or adding) the one which include
HTTP header but without XOP processing there.
Frank Yung-Fong Tang
Îñţérñåţîöñåļîžåţîöñ Šýšţém Årçĥîţéçţ
Received on Friday, 8 October 2004 20:51:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:00 UTC