W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > June 2004

Issue 480 closed

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:29:07 -0700
Message-ID: <40E22573.9040201@oracle.com>
To: jacek.kopecky@deri.at
Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org

Jacek,

You raised an issue (#480) [1] regarding the Representation header [2] 
LC doc. The WG agreed to classify the issue as editorial and directed 
the editors to address your comment.

Details:

 >1) Section 2.1, Representation header is not required, but may be
 >useful, when multiple references...

The sentence in question in section 2.1 has been changed to read:
  "The Representation header block is also useful when multiple 
references to the same resource are required but duplication of the 
resource is undesirable."

 >2) Section 2.1 should the space around base64 characters in the example
 >be dropped?

The space around the base64 characters has been removed.

 >3) Section 2.3.2: does reinsert have the [specified] prop w/value
 >"true"? I believe not.

Section 2.2.3 (and not 2.3.2) is _not_ changed. The [specified] property 
value is indeed 'true'. This requires the attribute to be specified and 
not defaulted.

 >4) 2.3.2 Example Example - the link to the example should probably be
 >titled otherwise 8-)

The sentence is question is now changed to:
"An example of this usage is shown in Example 1."

Hope this resolution is satisfactory.

-Anish
--

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x480
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-soap12-rep-20040608/
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 22:30:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT