W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > June 2004

LC comments on Resource Representation header

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.at>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 18:45:32 +0200
To: XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1087577132.3043.70.camel@Kalb>

Hi all, 8-)

Here are my (potentially) non-editorial comments on the LC draft of XOP:

1) section 1.2 needs to be filled

2) Section 2.1 talks about extracted content but makes no reference to
XOP or MTOM, a reader new to these specs and starting with
Representation header would have no idea what is being talked about. 

3) Representation header is not a SOAP module, I think it would be
beneficial for describing the messages (say in WSDL) if it had a formal
name.

4) in section 2.2, should it be said that namespace-qualified elements
and attributes on Rep elements must not be in Rep namespace?

5) section 2.3 should probably be marked informative

6) section 2.3.3, the example should probably be inside
rep:Representation element

I'll send my editorial comments (or what I see as such) in a separate
message.

Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Ph.D. researcher
                   Digital Enterprise Research Institute
                   http://www.deri.at/
Received on Friday, 18 June 2004 12:45:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT