Re: Issue 487 closed

Hi Martin,

At 2:03 AM -0700 04.7.19, Martin Gudgin wrote:
>You raised an issue, number 487[1] regarding language in Section A.3 of
>the XOP
>specification[1]. The Working Group decided that use of the word
>'format' in the second sentence was incorrect and that the word
>'semantics' should be used instead as in the first sentence. The text
>will be amended to read:
>
>
>"XOP Documents allow extensions to the xop:Include element when they do
>not change its semantics. Changes to the semantics MUST be identified by
>a new namespace URI (i.e., they MUST define a new Include element
>information item in another namespace)."

The suggested change make sense, and I'm happy with this resolution.

-- 
Jun Fujisawa
<mailto:fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>

Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2004 15:40:23 UTC