Issue 479 closed

Jacek,
You raised an issue 479 on the "SOAP Resource Representation Header" 
specification[1].

> 1) section 1.2 needs to be filled

It has been filled, see the editors' copy [2]

> 2) Section 2.1 talks about extracted content but makes no reference to
> XOP or MTOM, a reader new to these specs and starting with
> Representation header would have no idea what is being talked about.

Fixed, "extracted content" has been replaced by "resource"

> 3) Representation header is not a SOAP module, I think it would be
> beneficial for describing the messages (say in WSDL) if it had a formal
> name.

Fixed, the document now defines a SOAP Feature and a SOAP Module. The name 
of the specification has been changed to reflect that, it is now "Resource 
Representation SOAP Header Block"

> 4) in section 2.2, should it be said that namespace-qualified elements
> and attributes on Rep elements must not be in Rep namespace?

The schema has been changed to reflect that, see [3]

> 5) section 2.3 should probably be marked informative

Done (by mean of stating that it is an example)

> 6) section 2.3.3, the example should probably be inside
> rep:Representation element

Done.

I trust this addresses your concern.

Regards

(For the XMLP Working Group)

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-soap12-rep-20040608/
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/3/06/Attachments/Representation.html
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2004Jun/0059.html

-- 
Yves Lafon - W3C
"Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."