W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > July 2004

Re: The content of rep:Data element

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:41:37 -0700
Message-ID: <40F48141.4000000@oracle.com>
To: Jun Fujisawa <fujisawa.jun@canon.co.jp>
Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org, "Xml-Dist-App@W3. Org" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Why does it have to be in canonical lexical form?
Is this because of MTOM's requirement?
The SOAP Resource Representation Header block can exist independent of 
MTOM, therefore I think it is unnecessary to say that the lexical form 
must be the canonical form. Although, it is certainly true that if it 
isn't in the canonical form then one cannot use MTOM to optimize it.


Jun Fujisawa wrote:

> Here is a review comment to SOAP Resource Representation Header
> Last Call specification. Sorry about the late feedback.
> Section 2.2.4, the value of a rep:Data element is described as just
> "a base64 encoded representation" of a Web resource. I think this
> should be "a base64 encoded representation in the canonical lexical
> form".
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 21:54:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:17:00 UTC