Re: treatment of ns prefixes by intermediaries

> This question came up during an implementer's interop test session: Is an
> intermediary obliged to preserve namespace prefixes? The spec says nothing
> explicitly (that we could find) but appears to implicitly oblige
> intermediaries to preserve them. What did the WG intend?

Since [prefix] is an EII I would assume it's preserved.

If not, then signatures break.
	/r$