- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:35:46 -0700
- To: <reagle@w3.org>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Joseph, The subsetting/detachment process was decided as part of issue 241[1] ( which the WG decided to close with no action[2] ). Given that the WG declined to say anything about subsetting/detachment WRT 241, the editors did not consider it necessary to say anything WRT 253[3]. Martin [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x241 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/2002Jul/0105.html [3] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x253 > -----Original Message----- > From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org] > Sent: 16 September 2002 06:37 > To: Martin Gudgin; xmlp-comments@w3.org > Subject: Re: Issue 253 closed > > > On Monday 16 September 2002 09:27 am, Martin Gudgin wrote: > > You raised an issue[1] against the SOAP 1.2 Part 1 Last > Call spec[2]. > > The editors have decided to resolve this issue by taking no action. > > SOAP does rely on XML base and RFC 2396 for dealing with relative > > URIs. The editors did not consider it necessary to say > anything about > > payload boundaries in this specification. > > > > Please let the WG know ASAP if this resolution is not acceptable. > > It's useful when responding to comments if a WG can respond to the > substantive aspects so we ensure we at least have an > understanding. Did the > WG choose to take no action because the think subsetting/detachment > processes (such as a removing a payload, or a partial XML > Signature) will > *not* break across boundaries, or they agree that they will > but it is not > their concern? > > > Regards > > > > Martin Gudgin > > For the XML Protocol Working Group > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x253 > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/ > > -- > Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ > W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org > IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ > W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/ > >
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 00:36:29 UTC