Issue 286: closed

• From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
• Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:18:35 +0200
• To: duerst@w3.org, Dear XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <3D85CC1B.7080504@crf.canon.fr>

Martin,

You asked whether in 7.1, first note, the intermediary was "a 
soap intermediary or an http intermediary"?

The XMLP WG has decided to closed this issue by inserting the 
following text:

   "(which may or may not also be SOAP intermediaries)"

Please let us know asap if this is not acceptable.

Regards,

Jean-Jacques.

Received on Monday, 16 September 2002 08:18:42 UTC