W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > May 2002

FW: Transport Binding Reviews

From: Williams, Stuart <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 10:16:25 +0100
Message-ID: <5E13A1874524D411A876006008CD059F192BAE@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
To: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Cc: "'Eamon O'Tuathail'" <eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com>
[Copied to xmlp-comments for the record]

-----Original Message-----
From: Eamon O'Tuathail [mailto:eamon.otuathail@clipcode.com]
Sent: 22 May 2002 10:11
To: 'Williams, Stuart'
Subject: RE: Transport Binding Reviews


Looking through my old emails, I came across this one from you, hidden
among lots of others. Sorry, I did not spot it when it arrived, or
respond until now. 

>> The substance of this discussion made it into the December WD [5] will
>> remain in subsequent revisions [6].

>> The WG agreed at its most recent telcon to revise the request/response
>> mep to allow a temporal overlap between a response message and its 
>> corresponding request. The proposal that was agreed on is made in [7]
>> (and referenced materials). It will be incorporated into the next
>> published spec. WD.

Both of these look fine. 



P.S. I got the Robin Milner books you recommended to me a while back -
they are very interesting. 


Sent: 02 May 2002 15:33
To: 'Eamon O'Tuathail'
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org; 'xmlp-comments@w3.org'
Subject: Re: Transport Binding Reviews


In December you responded [1] to David Fallside's request [2] for
on the transport binding framework that was being incorporated into
Drafts that were published in December [3,4].

As we work towards our next Working Draft I have been asked to let you
how the WG has respond to your comments. It would be helpful if you
let us know whether we have adequately addressed you comments by 10th
2002 and if not what further action you would like the WG to take.
Received on Wednesday, 22 May 2002 05:16:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:58 UTC