W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Updated example (was Re: RDF response on XMLP Issue #29)

From: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:40:44 -0800
To: Eric Miller <em@w3.org>, nilo.mitra@ericsson.com
Cc: danbri@w3.org, w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org, w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org, xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF07EBADD2.AE1E52A2-ON88256B8B.00090450@boulder.ibm.com>

Eric, thanks for your comment on the Primer example. I am cc'ing
xmlp-comments where we lodge such suggestions (although please omit
xmlp-comments in any further discussion of this topic), and the Primer
editor.
David

............................................
David C. Fallside, IBM
Ext Ph: 530.477.7169
Int  Ph: 544.9665
fallside@us.ibm.com



|---------+---------------------------------->
|         |           Eric Miller <em@w3.org>|
|         |           Sent by:               |
|         |           w3c-xml-protocol-wg-req|
|         |           uest@w3.org            |
|         |                                  |
|         |                                  |
|         |           03/28/2002 08:17 AM    |
|         |                                  |
|---------+---------------------------------->
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |                                                                                                                           |
  |       To:       David Fallside/Santa Teresa/IBM@IBMUS, danbri@w3.org                                                      |
  |       cc:       w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org, w3c-semweb-cg@w3.org                                                          |
  |       Subject:  Updated example (was Re: RDF response on XMLP Issue #29)                                                  |
  |                                                                                                                           |
  |                                                                                                                           |
  >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|



At 07:08 PM 3/19/2002 -0800, David Fallside wrote:

>2. As part of the statement, you may provide us with an RDF-encoding-style
>URI. The SOAP 1.2 Primer includes an RDF example [2], what would you think
>about us stating as part of this example that the RDF-encoding URI is
>whatever it is you provide us with? (We are of course interested in any
>comments you have on the example.)
>
>[1] http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns
>[2]
>http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/01/29/edcopy-soap12-part0-20020129.html#L3374


For educational purposes (e.g. SOAP Primer) I'd offer
http://www.w3.org/2002/03/simple-soap-rdf as a replacement example that
perhaps better reflects an example of how RDF/XML might be syntactically
included in a SOAP message body.

Also note the example
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/01/29/edcopy-soap12-part0-20020129.html#L3374

is not valid XML (e.g. <m:reference> ... </reference>), the simple-soap-rdf

example above corrects this problem.

--
eric miller                              http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead               http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
w3c world wide web consortium            http://www.w3.org/
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2002 20:44:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT