- From: Murali Janakiraman <murali@roguewave.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 11:42:04 -0800
- To: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: Murali Janakiraman <murali@roguewave.com>
Hi all,
Issue 113 [1] is closed as proposed in message [2].
In a nut shell, the following explanation and the examples below captures
the resolution. For more details, read message [2].
The existence of a return value is signified by the presence of a
namespace-qualified accessor named 'result' with the namespace identifier
"<http://www.w3.org/2001/12/soap-rpc>" and void returns are not expected to
have the above named accessor.
Example 1: An example of an envelope with a successful RPC response of a
procedure with a return value and an [out] parameter.
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="<http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope>">
<env:Body>
<m:GetLastTradePriceResponse
env:encodingStyle="<http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-encoding>"
xmlns:m="<http://example.org/2001/06/quotes>"
xmlns:r="<http://www.w3.org/2001/06/rpc>">
<r:result>34.1</r:result>
<StockName>Foo, inc.</StockName>
</m:GetLastTradePriceResponse>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
Example 2: An example of an envelope with a successful RPC response of a
procedure with a void return value and an [out] parameter.
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="<http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-envelope>">
<env:Body>
<m:GetLastTradePriceResponse
env:encodingStyle="<http://www.w3.org/2001/06/soap-encoding>"
xmlns:m="<http://example.org/2001/06/quotes>"
xmlns:r="<http://www.w3.org/2001/06/rpc>">
<Price>34.1</Price>
</m:GetLastTradePriceResponse>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x113
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Feb/0231.html
Rogue Wave User Conference in Vail, Colorado, July 2002! :
http://www.roguewave.com/corp/events/usersgroup/
Received on Monday, 4 March 2002 14:43:44 UTC