W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > June 2002

Assertion 91

From: Asir S Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 16:55:59 -0400
To: <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OKEBJFDOCNPMPLOONLOIGEJOCIAA.asirv@webmethods.com>

I was asked to send this to xmlp-comments

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: akarmark@oracle.com [mailto:akarmark@oracle.com]On Behalf Of Anish
Karmarkar
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 3:08 PM
To: asirv@webmethods.com
Cc: w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Assertion 91


Asir,

Thanks for pointing that out.
This is a residual.

General question: Should this be fixed in the current LC draft or are
the drafts supposed to be frozen? Lynne has also found another residual
in assertion 14.

Thanks.

-Anish
--

Asir S Vedamuthu wrote:
>
> Assertion 91 in LC Test Collection [1] doc refers to,
>
> "For a graph edge which is distinguished by label ( "struct" or
"generic" ),
> the namespace name property of the element information item determines
> whether the edge label is globally or locally scoped: "
>
> However, Part 2 no longer makes such a distinction. Is this a bug? or
> residual?
>
> [1]
>
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-testcollection.html#assertion
> spart2
>
> Regards,
>
> Asir S Vedamuthu
>
> webMethods, Inc.
> 703-460-2513 or asirv@webmethods.com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2002 16:51:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT