During some of the "a priori" debates, an issue emerged that hasn't yet been addressed in the spec (AFAIK). It's mentioned here; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002May/0044.html "[...] I wonder how many SOAP developers are under the impression that if they send a SOAP message to an arbitrary URI, and get a 200 response back, that this means that the SOAP message was processed? More than a few, I would expect. Noah's GET-in-SOAP pseudo-proposal[1] appears to work this way." Proposed solution (from the referenced message above); To mention that the context in which the URI is discovered can provide sufficient information to know whether a URI identifies a SOAP endpoint. And that without this kind of information, it can't be known whether or not the SOAP message was processed as a SOAP message. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. distobj@acm.org http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.comReceived on Friday, 19 July 2002 09:42:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT