W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > December 2002

Re: Closing XML Protocol Last Call issue 395

From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 14:45:07 -0500
To: "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cc: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFF365B64F.5BC8642E-ON85256C85.006C2ADB@lotus.com>

I certainly don't want to delay things here, but I am a little unclear on 
how Infosets handle internal subsets in the first place.  I've read it a 
few times, and though it's somewhat difficult for me to figure out 
(presumably my fault), it's not clear to me that internal subsets are ever 
reflected in an infoset.  That being the case, I'm not clear that one can 
say that a serialization with a DTD is a worse serialization of a given 
infoset than one without.  I would be glad to be educated as to why the 
XML serialization of an Infoset with no DTD is unambiguously the XML 1.x 
with no internal subset.

If indeed there is an ambiguity, then I think the proposed resolution 
would not be acceptable.  We would need to explicitly say:  the 
serialization of RFC 3023 but with the restriction that an internal subset 
MUST NOT be present. 

I am also a little unclear as to whether the env:SENDER error is a SHOULD 
or a MUST in the case that an internal subset is erroneously received.  Am 
I off base in pursuing these concerns?

------------------------------------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
------------------------------------------------------------------







"Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
12/02/2002 01:05 PM

 
        To:     "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
        cc:     <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
        Subject:        Closing XML Protocol Last Call issue 395


 
Noah,

In response to XML Protocol Last Call issue 395 [1], the WG has decided
to adopt the resolution stated in [2]. I hope this resolution is
satisfactory, otherwise please send your concerns in a mail to
xml-dist-app@w3.org including the issue number in the subject

Thank you,

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com
 
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x395
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2002Nov/0078.html
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2002 14:46:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:28 GMT