I think that is ok even though I would have preferred a clarification. Thanks, Henrik >-----Original Message----- >From: David Fallside [mailto:fallside@us.ibm.com] >Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 18:35 >To: frystyk; xmlp-comments@w3.org >Subject: XMLP WG closes issue 324 > > >The XML Protocol (XMLP) WG has decided to close issue 324 [1], >which you originated, with the following resolution. > >The WG decided to close the issue without making any change to >the spec. The WG felt that the existing text conveys the >correct and appropriate meaning. > >If this resolution is not satisfactory to you, please contact >the WG asap. > >[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues#x324 > >............................................ >David C. Fallside, IBM >Ext Ph: 530.477.7169 >Int Ph: 544.9665 >fallside@us.ibm.comReceived on Friday, 23 August 2002 15:10:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:27 GMT