W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > August 2002

RE: issue 227

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:28:26 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D086181E9@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Mark A. Jones" <jones@research.att.com>, <jacek@systinet.com>, <marc.hadley@sun.com>, <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, <xmlp-comments@w3.org>

I almost don't dare but would it be possible for Mark Jones who I
believe started this thread to reformulate the resolution as agreed

FWIW, my understanding is that 

A) features are abstract and do not necessarily reflect API or
implementation concerns.

B) A binding may state what operations it depends on being performed
whether they are defined by the binding specification directly or
inherited from other specifications.

C) The HTTP binding is no exception and resolution A) and B) therefore
apply to it including for the WebMethod property

Is that close?

Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 14:28:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:59 UTC