W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > August 2002

Closing issue 219

From: Glen Daniels <gdaniels@macromedia.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:05:17 -0400
Message-ID: <CB1FF0A474AEA84EA0206D5B05F6A4CB0102C69E@S1001EXM02.macromedia.com>
To: "'xmlp-comments@w3.org'" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>, "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Cc: "'skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com'" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Hi folks!

On July 31st, the WG agreed to close issue #219 [1] as follows:

Replace the sentence in section 3.1 beginning with "A feature expressed as SOAP headers..." with the following:

"When a feature is expressed this way, the combined syntax and semantics of such headers are known as a SOAP Module, and are specified according to the rules in section 3.2 SOAP Modules."

Then replace the first two sentences of 3.2 with:

"The term 'SOAP Module' refers to the set of syntax and semantics associated with implementing a particular feature (link to 3.1) as SOAP headers.  A Module is described in a Module Specification, which adheres to the following rules.  It:"

Further, we agreed to insert the following as the new second rule in section 3.2, moving the other rules down one:

"2. MUST, *if* the Module implements a Feature which has already been defined elsewhere, clearly refer to said Feature's URI.  Note that a Module may EITHER explicitly refer to a separate Feature in this way OR may implicitly define a Feature simply by describing the semantics of the Module."

(note that this last bit relies on a Feature having a URI, which is dealt with by the resolution of issue #230 [2])

Please send any comments to xml-dist-app.



[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x219
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x230
Received on Friday, 2 August 2002 10:05:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:59 UTC