W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Closing Issue 188: When should xml declarations appear in examples?

From: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 17:49:47 -0400
To: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
Cc: "XML Protocol Comments" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF45F35D09.B1D90CC9-ON85256B97.0078E81F@lotus.com>
Given that proper use of  the properties in question is carefully 
described in [2], I find this resolution acceptable.  Thank you!

Noah Mendelsohn                              Voice: 1-617-693-4036
IBM Corporation                                Fax: 1-617-693-8676
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142

"Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>
04/10/2002 05:52 PM

        To:     "Noah Mendelsohn" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
        cc:     "XML Protocol Comments" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
        Subject:        Closing Issue 188: When should xml declarations appear in examples?


The XML Protocol Working Group have closed Issue 188[1] with the following

The attributes found in the XML declaration, namely version, encoding and
standalone are modelled in the infoset as the [version], [character 
scheme] and [standalone] properties of the Document Information Item. 
XML declarations in examples is thus completely coherent.

I would also note that the latest editor's copy[2] makes explicit 
to the infoset properties listed above.

If you have any objection to the above resolution it would be helpful for
the Working Group to receive such feedback as soon as possible.


Martin Gudgin

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues#x188
[2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/1/10/11/soap12-part1.xml#soapenv
Received on Wednesday, 10 April 2002 18:05:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:16:58 UTC