W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > November 2001

why text/xml?

From: MURATA Makoto <mmurata@trl.ibm.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 17:04:54 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20011116.170454.01364925.mmurata@trl.ibm.com>
To: xmlp-comments@w3.org 
Dear colleagues,

I am a little surprised to see Part 2 of SOAP 1.2 still 
uses text/xml.

As a co-author of RFC 3023 (XML Media Types), I have repeatedly 
asked not to use text/xml.  I must say that I am a little 
dissapointed.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Sep/0085.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Dec/0152.html

Please let me know why the XML Protocol WG has decided to 
ignore RFC 3023 (and arguably RFC 2046), which is a Proposed 
Standard of IETF.  I will then forward the answer to the IETF-XML-MIME
mailing list.

Sincerely yours,

MURATA Makoto
Received on Friday, 16 November 2001 03:08:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:26 GMT