W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > November 2001

Issue 48 Closed (re: custom data encodings)

From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2001 14:44:42 +0000
Message-ID: <3BE2B15A.6070108@sun.com>
To: Vidur Apparao <vidur@netscape.com>
CC: xmlp-comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Vidur,

You raised an issue [1] to the XML Protocol WG pertaining to the use of 
custom data encodings in SOAP.

We resolved this during the WG conference call on 31st Oct 2001 by
agreeing that:

(i) An implementation of SOAP could be conformant without
supporting the SOAP encoding. i.e. Support of the SOAP encoding is
optional in implementations.
(ii) The SOAP encoding is dependent on the SOAP data model
and that the RPC convention is dependent on the SOAP data model and the
SOAP encoding.
(iii) Tests would be provided for implementations claiming conformance
with the SOAP encoding.

To resolve issue 48 we agreed to the following two actions:

(a) Instructing the editors of the SOAP specification to clarify the 
optional nature of the SOAP encoding in the specification and to clearly 
describe the dependencies between SOAP, the SOAP data model, SOAP 
encoding and RPC convention.
(b) Instructing the conformance subgroup to include tests for SOAP
encoding conformance, but to note the optional nature of the SOAP
encoding in the test suite. i.e. SOAP implementations may choose not to
implement the SOAP encoding, but if they claim conformance with the SOAP
encoding they must pass all of the SOAP encoding conformance tests.

As such, the WG considers the issue closed. Please let us know if
this is an acceptable resolution.

Regards,
Marc.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x48



-- 
Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
XML Technology Centre, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Friday, 2 November 2001 09:46:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:26 GMT