Looks really good to me. I'd much prefer this over the previously floated proposals to remove it or make it optional. Cheers Simon www.pocketsoap.com On Sat, 9 Jun 2001 10:27:54 -0700, in soap you wrote: > >Note that there has been work going on in clarifying the SOAPAction use >- I would be interested in hearing what you think about that > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001May/0053.html > >Henrik > >>If A & B are the only choices they i'd pick B, A is just an >>interop mess waiting to happen. >> >>However, SOAPAction in its current (i.e. SOAP 1.1) form, does >>serve a useful purpose, my only complaint is that the spec >>doesn't describe very well how to use it.Received on Saturday, 9 June 2001 14:08:50 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:26 GMT