W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > December 2001

Re: issue #159 resolution addendum

From: Andrew Layman <andrew@strongbrains.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 19:55:01 -0800
Message-ID: <004401c181f7$9bed2600$b815e73f@andrewxps>
To: xmlp-comments@w3.org
Perhaps I am reading this out of context, but the quote sounds peculiar to
me.  The soap-enc:encodingStyle attribute says that the writer asserts that
IF you follow the rules you will end up a certain graph; but that is not the
same as forbidding all readers to use other processes and end up with
something else.  Does this resolution say that it is improper to apply XSL
to elements within the scope of a soap-enc:encodingStyle attribute? To
render the characters in an emacs display without ever deserializing? etc.

Andrew Layman
http://strongbrains.com  -- Resources for Self-Education
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacek Kopecky" <jacek@systinet.com>
To: "XMLP Comments" <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Cc: <dug@us.ibm.com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 11:09 AM
Subject: issue #159 resolution addendum


Hello all. 8-)
 I apologize but only after rereading the minutes of the f2f
meeting (not public yet, but soon) I've realized that resolution
to #159 contains the following, too:

 "Change 'can' to 'MUST' in section 4.1.1 of part 1 of the spec:
the >>serialization rules that can be used to deserialize the
SOAP message<< should be changed to >>serialization rules that
MUST be used to deserialize the SOAP message<<."

 Best regards,

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/
Received on Monday, 10 December 2001 23:04:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:26 GMT