W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xmlp-comments@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Resolution to issues #18 and #121: top-level unclear

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:26:36 +0100 (CET)
To: Paul Kulchenko <paulclinger@yahoo.com>
cc: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, XMLP Comments <xmlp-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112031724410.18637-100000@mail.idoox.com>
Paul, all issues you mentioned were added to the XMLP issues list
a while ago and their resolutions follow or will follow soon. See
issues 169, 170 and 171. 8-)

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, Paul Kulchenko wrote:

 > Hi, Jacek!
 >
 > That looks reasonable, but proposal says nothing about forward vs.
 > backward references, merging attributes on href/id elements, and
 > references between headers or body and header. I hoped that
 > definition of "top level" will address at least some of those.
 > Thanks.
 >
 > Best wishes, Paul.
 >
 > --- Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com> wrote:
 > >  Hi, the WG has decided to close the issue #18 with the
 > > resolution as presented in [1], generally by removing the terms
 > > "top-level of serialization" and "independent elements" and thus
 > > also allowing embedded multiref elements.
 > >  The issue #121 is duplicate of #18.
 > >  Best regards,
 > >
 > >                    Jacek Kopecky
 > >
 > >                    Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
 > >                    http://www.systinet.com/
 > >
 > >
 > > [1]
 > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Nov/0041.html
 > >
 > >
 >
 >
 > __________________________________________________
 > Do You Yahoo!?
 > Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.
 > http://shopping.yahoo.com
 >
Received on Monday, 3 December 2001 11:26:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:42:26 GMT