W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > September 2000

Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-daigle-uri-std-00.txt

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 12:36:30 -0400
Message-ID: <39B7C40E.5B4FB3B2@reutershealth.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote:

> Not so: every URL is a URI[1]; every URI identifies exactly
> one resource[2]; hence every URL identifies exactly one resource.


> [2] "An identifier is an object that can act as a reference to
>          something that has identity."
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt

I have no problem with this.  However, it is not clear to me
why distinct URLs must refer to distinct resources.  My contention
is that




represent the same *resource*, not merely the same entity body.
Both URIs refer to the mapping between the Unicode and ISO 8859-1
character sets.

Or at least that this could be so, if the Unicode Consortium said
it was so.

There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2000 12:36:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:44 UTC