W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > September 2000

Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-daigle-uri-std-00.txt

From: Graham Klyne <GK@Dial.pipex.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 10:47:59 +0100
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000906104543.00aae370@pop.dial.pipex.com>
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
At 02:00 PM 9/5/00 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>Comparison of URIs is only the beginning, and I note that this draft
>doesn't refer to either Henrik Frystyk Nielsen's favorite RFC (2616) or
>Larry Masinter's favorite (2557).

Hmmm...  these are both protocol-specific documents, rather than documents 
about URIs in general.  That said, much of the current usage of URIs 
derives from HTTP (and the definition of entities, I think), so RFC 2616 is 
probably a reasonable citation there.

I'm not so sure why MHTML/RFC 2557 is relevant here.

#g


------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2000 05:52:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:25 GMT