At 09:38 PM 5/29/00 -0400, you wrote: >Sounds fine to me. It just means that I'll wait for 2.0 before I >implement anything using XML Namespaces. I don't mean that to be facetious. >Its just that, since I assumed (which was my fault) that namespace names >were URIs in all respects, I now consider this version to be broken for >my purposes... > >That doesn't mean its broken for yours.... Exactly... though I suspect the subset that works for you will work in pretty much every non-relative URI case possible in Namespaces in XML 1.0. I'm not sure, however - from your perspective - that it's worth waiting, unless you're very fond of relative URIs. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth http://www.simonstl.comReceived on Monday, 29 May 2000 21:59:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:23 GMT