On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:27:26PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > At 08:57 PM 5/29/00 -0400, Clark C. Evans wrote: > <snip> > Does this sound like a plausible solution to our current quandary? Sounds fine to me. It just means that I'll wait for 2.0 before I implement anything using XML Namespaces. I don't mean that to be facetious. Its just that, since I assumed (which was my fault) that namespace names were URIs in all respects, I now consider this version to be broken for my purposes... That doesn't mean its broken for yours.... -MM -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Mealling | Vote Libertarian! | www.rwhois.net/michael Sr. Research Engineer | www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett | ICQ#: 14198821 Network Solutions | www.lp.org | michaelm@netsol.comReceived on Monday, 29 May 2000 21:49:00 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:23 GMT