John Cowan wrote: > Liam Quin scripsit: > > > Finally, it would make sense to abandon the idea of having a URI in there > > at all, and use a formally defined name, preferably one that does not > > start with "http:" in any examples :-) > > Then you lose the advantage of leveraging the existing infrastructure > to help you assign a unique name. True. But that leverage may come at too high a price. Paul AbrahamsReceived on Saturday, 27 May 2000 12:02:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:23 GMT