W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Namespaces and namespace names: a new synthesis?

From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 22:29:16 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <m12vRfQ-000OdCC@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
To: cowan@locke.ccil.org
CC: xml-uri@w3.org


> I think this may produce at least an equality of dissatisfaction.
> Is there anyone who absolutely can't live with this scheme?

I could live with that.

David (resubscribed from home)

Received on Friday, 26 May 2000 17:47:46 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: David Carlisle: "Re: Namespace names: a semi-serious proposal"
Previous message: Simon St.Laurent: "Re: Inclusions and other gotchas (was:Re: inclusion)"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Namespaces and namespace names: a new synthesis?"
Next in thread: Larry Masinter: "RE: Namespaces and namespace names: a new synthesis?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:23 GMT