Re: RDF namespace conventions from W. E. Perry on 2000-05-22 (xml-uri@w3.org from May 2000)

From: W. E. Perry <wperry@fiduciary.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 18:04:28 -0400
To: xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <3929AEEC.4E8CAEC1@fiduciary.com>

Are my glasses too rosy, or has this thread now brought forth the
conceptual
framework (layers!) which breaks the logjam? I do not see that the
apparent
agreement here requires the one-and-only-one choice offered on the
'call the
question' thread. Is that in fact the understanding of, at least,
the participants
in this thread?

Walter Perry

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:

> There only needs to be enmity when higher-level layers begin insisting on
> changes in lower levels, which cannot be easily justified at those lower
> levels and which may have effects on other applications built using a
> different set of upper layers.

Received on Monday, 22 May 2000 18:04:34 UTC