- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:31:13 -0500
- To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, <xml-uri@w3.org>, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
At 11:51 AM 2000-05-22 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > >So, the layer separation you suggest would work only with either >(a) no relative URIs -- at least a warning that XML lower layers don't grok >them, or >(b) change lower layers to absolutize before comparing. > >Either of these would be consistent. The second would be cleaner. > Cleaner product, dirtier process. [Personal opinion: not enough cleaner product to warrant the process breakage.] (a) under the 'warning' interpretation (NOT "no relative") might seem to be the most-broadly-agreeable way to move ahead. We haven't taken a fresh straw poll in this group to be sure. Al
Received on Monday, 22 May 2000 15:19:57 UTC