Re: A proposed solution

> As a chief offendor, I am going to take the pledge:
>
> I for one am going to suspend flaming about broad issues for a week,
to
> make sure more people have the time they need to evaluate the proposal
we
> have received from the original editors of the specification.

Just to clarify - David Turner and I are not the editors of the
(namespace?) spec. Andrew Layman of course is a co-editor along with Tim
Bray and Dave Hollander [1]. David Turner is the Microsoft Advisory
Committee representative [2] to the W3C. I am just me.

> Do we need corresponding statements about exactly what hapens with
InfoSet
> and XPath as well, to complete the review package?
>
> Does anyone need a walk-through of why X-Base is not on that list?
Have
> you carefully re-read the posts from Paul Grosso?

Henrik

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml-names/
[2] http://www.w3.org/Member/ACList (W3C members only)