Re: A proposed solution

• From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
• Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 09:00:16 -0700
• To: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>, <XML-uri@w3.org>, "David Turner" <dturner@microsoft.com>
• Cc: <connolly@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <004f01bfd22b$d08a1440$83b11eac@redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Nope - it doesn't force you to absolutize - it merely says that you
can't use relative URIs without knowing the context within they are
defined.

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen,
mailto:frystyk@microsoft.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net>
To: <XML-uri@w3.org>; "David Turner" <dturner@microsoft.com>
Cc: <connolly@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2000 14:50
Subject: Re: A proposed solution


> Isn't this proposal simply a proposal for absolutization?

Received on Friday, 9 June 2000 12:55:28 UTC