W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > June 2000

Re: a clarification?

From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 18:58:55 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <m12xZF9-000OdCC@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
To: jcowan@reutershealth.com
CC: xml-uri@w3.org


> Actually, it's no problem:  "uuid:xxx-xxxx-xxxxx-xxxxxx#foo" is a
> valid

hey you cheated. Try it again without the # :-)

David

Received on Thursday, 1 June 2000 14:07:02 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tim Berners-Lee: "Re: Namespace names: a modification of a semi-serious proposal"
Previous message: David Carlisle: "Re: URIs quack like a duck"
In reply to: John Cowan: "Re: a clarification?"
Next in thread: Paul W. Abrahams: "Re: a clarification?"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:24 GMT