Re: Latest XLink Candidate Recommendation

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:

>  I'd strongly prefer that XLink
> require URI references, should it use them at all as identifiers, to be
> absolutized by the authors - i.e., forbid relative URI references and
> require literal comparison of strings.

I agree, I agree, but please send it to www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org,
so that your views get on file.  (Actually, don't bother; I've
forwarded *this* message there.

> Otherwise we'll have all the same comparison issues we've debated here ad
> nauseam inflicted on XLink.  If the RDF community enjoys that burden,
> they're welcome to it, but I'd rather not drop comparison issues on yet
> another audience.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)