Re: Latest XLink Candidate Recommendation

At 10:17 AM 7/10/00 -0400, Eve L. Maler wrote:
>As always, I appreciate your thoughtful writeup.  We in the Linking group 
>will definitely have to look at the issue, though my understanding agrees 
>with yours (that RDF assumes absolutizing because an RDF schema may exist 
>at the other end, and that XLink was getting this behavior "by reference").

The RDF spec. is explicit about requiring absolutization:  toward the end 
of section 6 is a 3-point list describing the interpretation of 
namespace-qualified attributes.  Item 1 makes explicit reference to RFC 
2996 section 5.2.

#g

------------
Graham Klyne
(GK@ACM.ORG)