W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > July 2000

Re: Why I moved from Forbid to Literal

From: David Carlisle <david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 00:25:53 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <m138We1-000OdDC@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk>
To: frystyk@microsoft.com
CC: XML-uri@w3.org

   You missed the point completely. This has nothing to do with advice - it
   is a strict requirement on the generator of a document using XML
   namespaces. Trying to turn it into a requirement on the consumer of a
   document that uses XML namespaces makes no sense.

   Henrik


But the point is that there is more than one person and more than one
document involved.

If I am creating a document with a namespace http://www.example.com/a
and someone else creates a document with a namespace
http://WWW.EXAMPLE.COM/a then which of us is in error?

Without some method of determining this I don't see any point on
stating that it is a "strict requirment" that one of us is in error.

The namespace spec provides no notion of defining a namespace separate
from using it in an xmlns declaration, so there is no way of deciding.

For some namespaces there may be a specification somewhere that gives a
cannonical form (eg http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform) but that is
not a necessary or enforceable feature of any particular namespace.

David
Received on Saturday, 1 July 2000 19:33:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 12 April 2005 12:17:25 GMT