Re: Namespaces spec is incomplete

At 10:35 AM 9/11/98 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote:
>Although some have argued that notations, entities and
>processing instructions do not require namespace-qualification,
>I disagree strongly with that assertion.
...
>I submit the following ...
>Name parts
>In XML, the fully-qualified name of any XML object is 
>considered to be composed of multiple parts, including:
...
Murray, your poits are plausible, but I have to say that
I think the WG chewed them over pretty thoroughly with 
a result that's reflected in the spec.  Reading your
note, it wasn't obvious to me which, if any, of your points
constituted new information/arguments. Could you highlight
that?  -Tim