Dear xml-names-editor, On 28/09/2002 13:53:10 Misha Wolf wrote: > On 27/09/2002 21:04:18 Misha Wolf wrote: > > Dear xml-names-editor, > > > > This mail contains some of the comments of the I18N WG on: > > Namespaces in XML 1.1 > > W3C Working Draft 5 September 2002 > > [The suggested examples below have been extended to include a decimal > numeric character reference, and have been slightly re-arranged.] > > Suggested examples: [...] It turns out [blush] that we had spelt "resumé" incorrectly. It actually has two accents and so isn't ideal as an example. So we propose "red&rosé" rather than "CV&resumé". Suggested examples: Consider: xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%a9" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%a9" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%A9" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%A9" xmlns="http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosÉ" where "é" has been defined to be "é". The first 5 are identical for the purpose of namespace reference matching and have the normalized attribute value [1]: http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosé The remaining 5 differ from the first 5, as well as from each other, and have the following normalized attribute values, respectively: http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%a9 http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%a9 http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%c3%A9 http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&ros%C3%A9 http://www.example.org/namespaces/red&rosÉ [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#AVNormalize Misha Wolf I18N WG Chair ------------------------------------------------------------- --- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2002 14:15:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:56:48 UTC