W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-names-editor@w3.org > December 2002

Re: XSL WG Comments on Namespace in XML 1.1

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:53:45 -0600
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20021209174900.00b1d290@172.27.10.30>
To: xml-names-editor@w3.org

The XSL WG has no objections to the XML Core WG's response [1] 
to the XSL WG's comments on the Namespaces in XML 1.1 Last Call.

The minutes of the XSL WG telcon of 2002 Dec 5 [2] include:

>3b. XSL WG Comments on Namespace in XML 1.1
>      http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2002Nov/0105.html
>      http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2002Nov/0109.html
>      http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2002Nov/0109.html
>
>KK:  Issue on two infosets.  They have clarified.
>
>MHK:  It s better for us to have one infoset as union of the two infoset.
>
>SCA:  What s the status?
>
>PG: Next document is one where we go to CR.  I can give you a pointer.
>
>We want to request CR on 12/10.  You can raise an objection which we can highlight or not.  If you have objections speak before 12/9.
>
>http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/12/CR-xml-names11-20021210
>
>SCA:  I think we will not object but I would reserve the right to object

And, in fact, no one objected before the end of Dec 9th.

Paul Grosso
by request of and in lieu of the XSL WG Chair
for the XSL WG
Received on Monday, 9 December 2002 18:54:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:43 GMT