- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 10:44:47 -0800
- To: "John Cowan" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: "Richard Tobin" <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>, "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, "Kay Michael" <Michael.Kay@softwareag.com>, "XML Core WG" <w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org>, <xml-names-editor@w3.org>
Great to hear that. Note that all these were hypothetical examples based on earlier discussions and proposals. All similarity to existing WDs is purely coincidential :-). Best regards Michael > -----Original Message----- > From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 21:13 PM > To: Michael Rys > Cc: Richard Tobin; John Cowan; Paul Grosso; Kay Michael; XML Core WG; w3c- > xml-query-wg@w3.org; xml-names-editor@w3.org > Subject: Re: FW: XML Query WG Feedback on Sept WD of Namespaces in XML 1.1 > > Michael Rys scripsit: > > > One example would be that XML 1.1 would have to be NFC normalized. > > Not so. XML 1.1 should (not must) be normalized, but non-normalized > documents > are still well-formed (if they meet the requirements). > > > Another example would be to limit acceptable name characters > > (disregarding the welcome fix of : in names) in 1.1. > > On the contrary, we are greatly extending them. > > -- > Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your John Cowan > ear. However, I would suggest you wash your jcowan@reutershealth.com > hands thoroughly before going to the toilet. > http://www.reutershealth.com > --gadicath http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Received on Friday, 6 December 2002 13:45:16 UTC