Re: Decryption Transform processing question

On Thursday 30 May 2002 01:23 pm, Ari Kermaier wrote:
> I had not considered the sort of document structure that Merlin used to
> illustrate potential ambiguities arising from the processing rules.
> Merlin makes a good point on this subject -- I'm just not sure I
> understand his proposal for dealing with super-encrypted elements by
> using multiple DecryptTransform elements in the dsig:Reference.

Hrmm... Yes, I was advocating for layers/wrappings/peeling, but then again 
if someone adds a layer of super-encryption, the whole point of this  
transform is to create a signature that works regardless of encryptions 
done in the future (since that's impossible to know.) One can't go back and 
add a Transform to a Signature, you'd break it...