On Thursday 30 May 2002 01:23 pm, Ari Kermaier wrote: > I had not considered the sort of document structure that Merlin used to > illustrate potential ambiguities arising from the processing rules. > Merlin makes a good point on this subject -- I'm just not sure I > understand his proposal for dealing with super-encrypted elements by > using multiple DecryptTransform elements in the dsig:Reference. Hrmm... Yes, I was advocating for layers/wrappings/peeling, but then again if someone adds a layer of super-encryption, the whole point of this transform is to create a signature that works regardless of encryptions done in the future (since that's impossible to know.) One can't go back and add a Transform to a Signature, you'd break it...Received on Thursday, 30 May 2002 15:13:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:03 UTC