W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > May 2002

Re: Draft registration for application/xenc+xml

From: by way of Joseph Reagle <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 14:15:56 -0400
To: xml-encryption@w3.org
Message-Id: <20020524181557.0B76B859F4@aeon.w3.org>
Joseph Reagle wrote:
> But absent TAG
> resolution, is anyone opposed to text that states "However, the
> application/xenc+xml type name MUST only be used for data objects in
> which the root element is from the XENC namespace."

Seems sensible to me.

> Also, Ian, in [3] what does it mean that the registration should be part
> of the REC? That I should have an appendix in the spec with a copy of my
> request? (seems odd...)

I think that's the idea.  Why odd? -Tim
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 14:16:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:03 UTC