- From: by way of Joseph Reagle <tbray@textuality.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 14:15:56 -0400
- To: xml-encryption@w3.org
Joseph Reagle wrote: > But absent TAG > resolution, is anyone opposed to text that states "However, the > application/xenc+xml type name MUST only be used for data objects in > which the root element is from the XENC namespace." Seems sensible to me. > Also, Ian, in [3] what does it mean that the registration should be part > of the REC? That I should have an appendix in the spec with a copy of my > request? (seems odd...) I think that's the idea. Why odd? -Tim
Received on Friday, 24 May 2002 14:16:27 UTC