W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-encryption@w3.org > March 2002

Re: More inter samples

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 17:24:43 -0500
Message-Id: <200203182224.RAA18305@tux.w3.org>
To: "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com>
Cc: xml-encryption@w3.org
On Saturday 16 March 2002 05:25, Takeshi Imamura wrote:
> Thanks, but I made some mistakes.  Could you modify the status as
> follows?

[1] http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2002/02-xenc-interop.html
new revision: 1.15

> >> Satisfactory Performance                           ""
> >Would you like to propose a *rough* ballpark of what an implementation
> >should be able to perform? Do you think this performance profile even
> > makes sense?
> I have the same opinion as Merlin's.

Ok, I'll still ask implementors to respond in the generic to the following 
question, "For your applications/purposes, is the performance 
satisfactory." Any other details I'll be happy to get (like size of 
documents, types of operation, type of platform, etc.), but I won't press 
that issue.


Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 18 March 2002 17:24:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:03 UTC